- From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 21:36:14 -0500
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > Will double-bleh do? > > Nope? I thought not. > > The proposal will work just fine so long as you don't get a pair of entites on the path that do the stupid together. > Hopefully this isn't something that would happen today, but who knows. > With a smaller max frame size and continuations, you need implementations that screwed up by more than just setting a single variable too big in order to screw with latency. For this to be accurate continuations would have to be improved to allow multiplexing. If they don�t they are equivalent to a large jumbo frame, just written in chunks. > > So, how much do we want to empower folks to shoot themselves in the head in order to deal with the 0.02% usecase? > > -=R -- Jason T. Greene WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 02:36:56 UTC