- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:35 +0200
- To: Marius Kleidl <marius@transloadit.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 15.05.2025 13:12, Marius Kleidl wrote: > Hello Julian, > > I started addressing your comments in two PRs [1][2], thank you again very > much! > > I have a follow-up question regarding this point: > >> 8. "Please note that the Content-Length header field cannot be used in > conjunction with the Transfer-Encoding header field." - really? > > RFC 9112 Section 6.2 [3] stats the following, which I interpret as > Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding being mutually exclusive: > >> A sender MUST NOT send a Content-Length header field in any message that > contains a Transfer-Encoding header field. > > Am I missing something here? Is there use of Transfer-Encoding used outside > of HTTP/1.1 as well? > > [1] https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/3088 > [2] https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/3092 > [3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-6.2-2 > > Best regards, > Marius Yes, you are right. Sorry! Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2025 11:34:37 UTC