- From: gitspeaks via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:43:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
>The spec has no need to list all properties that may establish a fixed CB in a centralized place. If you want this information, it's on you. I disagree - it should. Centralizing this kind of information improves clarity and consistency. >They are properties: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-2/#individual-transforms Sure, but that’s beside the point. The corresponding [transform functions](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms/#transform-functions) already fall under the behavior defined for the `transform` property. Whether they’re used via shorthand or as individual properties, the effect is the same - the containing block behavior is already accounted for. Listing them again as separate “properties” doesn’t add anything meaningful. The original text already mentions `transform`, which implicitly includes these. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gitspeaks Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12083#issuecomment-2813181804 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2025 14:43:33 UTC