Re: Quick Question on FWPD

Hi Wonsuk,

On 20/03/2025 02:44, 이원석 wrote:
> Hi. Pierre.
> Thanks for explanation and link.
>
> When do you expect for the FPWD of the group? In addition I think the 
> LWS wg was created in the Sept. of the last year, so I think the F2F 
> meeting might be good for the group and our work. Do you have any plan 
> for this?*
this  has not been discussed specifically, as far as I can remember.

TPAC 2025 would be a natural fit, but I don't know how many of the WG 
participants are planning to attend...

   pa

>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Wonsuk.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
> To: "이원석" <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>; <public-lws-wg@w3.org>; "Melvin 
> Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>;
> Cc:
> Sent: 2025-03-19 (수) 16:49:38 (UTC+09:00)
> Subject: Re: Quick Question on FWPD
>
> Hi Melvin, Wonsuk,
>
> time flies, doesn'it! 😅
>
> The answer is simply that we are a little late on out charter: we are 
> still focusing on the Use Case documents, and have not published any 
> draft for the specification itself. You haven't missed anything :)
>
> For future reference: all publications of the WG (including drafts) 
> will be listed here:
> https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/lws/publications/
> and this list is maintained automatically, so you can rely on it being 
> up-to-date.
>
>   best
>
> On 18/03/2025 02:46, 이원석 wrote:
>> Hi. Melvin and all.
>> Thanks to Melvin to raise this issue. I also have same question for 
>> the group.
>> I hope to be prepared the base document for this work.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Wonsuk.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Melvin Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> 
>> <mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>> To: <public-lws-wg@w3.org> <mailto:public-lws-wg@w3.org>;
>> Cc:
>> Sent: 2025-03-18 (화) 09:13:13 (UTC+09:00)
>> Subject: Quick Question on FWPD
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I saw in the Linked Web Storage Charter that the FWPD was expected 
>> around March 11, 2025. Just wondering—has it been published yet, or 
>> has the timeline shifted?
>>
>> If it's not ready yet, is there an overview available that explains 
>> how the different storage approaches fit together under one umbrella? 
>> As an app developer, I'd love to align my work with the direction 
>> this group is taking, and a bit of guidance would be really helpful.
>>
>> Appreciate any insights!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Melvin
>>