Re: Geolocation and POI

Hi all,

Naturally the map (in 2D) is an application ___domain of POI. 
And not only the bit image but also the vector graphics is possible.
SVG considers geographical coordinate systems.
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/coords.html#GeographicCoordinates


Satoru

<4C37B33E.3010901@perey.com> の、
   "Re: Geolocation and POI" において、
   "Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>"さんは書きました：

> Hi Gene,
> 
> Good expansion. This is material which should go into a meeting, I think.
> 
> This part:
> 
> from Gene Becker, July 9, 2010:
> 
> If the goal is to produce ___location standards that are more broadly 
> useful and responsive to the particular needs of AR, then it should 
> probably be a separate WG with an AR-specific charter beyond "POI". I 
> guess that discussion should also look to existing W3C 3D efforts; Web3D 
> folks are becoming active in AR, so there could be some converged 
> interests here as well.
> 
> There is also the issue of data representation in AR; I'd like to think 
> that a mechanism involving something analogous to user-agents and MIME 
> types could help us get to client-aware adaptation and data extensibility.
> 
> ======
> 
> I believe it was explained to me that a benefit of an AR WG is that it 
> can (and, in my opinion should) go beyond POI,  but for "starters" for 
> the first charter, the focus should be on what can be achieved.
> 
> Then, once the first objective is well underway, the WG can refocus its 
> charter on problems the group is equipped to address or feels there is 
> an urgent need for standardization.
> 
> Any other thoughts?
> 
> -- 
> Christine
> 
> Spime Wrangler
> 
> cperey@perey.com
> mobile +41 79 436 68 69
> VoIP (from US) +1 (617) 848-8159
> Skype (from anywhere) Christine_Perey
> 
> On 7/9/2010 8:18 PM, Gene Becker wrote:
> > If the goal is to produce ___location standards that are more broadly
> > useful and responsive to the particular needs of AR, then it should
> > probably be a separate WG with an AR-specific charter beyond "POI". I
> > guess that discussion should also look to existing W3C 3D efforts; Web3D
> > folks are becoming active in AR, so there could be some converged
> > interests here as well.
> >
> > Of course, as Christine points out, there are many more "triggers" for
> > AR, beyond just ___location. I'm not sure if these are ripe for
> > standardization, thoughts on this?
> >
> > There is also the issue of data representation in AR; I'd like to think
> > that a mechanism involving something analogous to user-agents and MIME
> > types could help us get to client-aware adaptation and data extensibility.
> 
>

Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 02:04:09 UTC