Re: USE CASEs: CREATE versus COMPUTE

Hi,

I can see a difference between a COMPUTE and CREATE use case. However, I 
believe clarification is needed.

Jacques' description of the CREATE AR Use case below was:

CREATE: POIs can be create using some authoring tools offline or using 
an AR browser in the real world

I disagree with this description.

We defined the CREATE use case, during the AR Standards meeting [1], as 
simply using a system which attaches/contributes a digital content 
�object� to or in the real world. This could be TweetAR.

It does not specify the tools being offline, and there's nothing which 
limits the system to one having an AR browser as a viewer.

Regards,

Christine

Spime Wrangler

cperey@perey.com
mobile (until Dec 7) +86 132 6171 6195
VoIP (rings in Beijing) +1 (617) 848-8159
Skype Christine_Perey

[1] http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/Three_Use_Cases.pdf

On 11/10/2010 1:20 PM, jacques lemordant wrote:
> Some more thoughts:
>
> CREATE was in Christine's list of USE CASE, but  COMPUTE is also interesting:
>
> CREATE: POIs can be create using some authoring tools offline or using an AR browser in the real world
>
> COMPUTE: POIs can be compute in real-time from GIS data (navigation applications) or through ___location-aware semantic search (cultural heritage applications)
>
> COMPUTE with ___location-aware semantic search could be a reason to look at a format based on RDF triple
> COMPUTE  with GIS data like OSM could be a reason to look at a format  using  XML triple: tag-value(openstretmap), property-content (opengraphprotocol)
>
> jacques
>
>

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 05:41:42 UTC