Is the discussion about geosocial itself? (too in depth) Or is the focus on discussing a geosocial task force? (maybe doable)

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:20 PM Emelia S. <emelia@brandedcode.com> wrote:

Hey Evan, Dmitri,

I'd probably recommend that the geosocial work should actually likely be the subject of a special topic call, since the subject matter is quite in-depth, and based on the turnout last call for geosocial matters, I feel like this would get quite involved and into the details on things.

My impression was that it wasn't just a quick update but more of a joint session?

— Emelia

On 31 Oct 2024, at 21:16, Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote:

Hey, Dmitri. Last month we had geosocial work on the agenda and we never got to it.

Could we include it this time around, and do it early?

Evan

On Oct 31, 2024 15:12, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

Apologies for short notice, but I'd like to postpone the monthly SocialWeb CG community call for one week, to be now on November 8, 2024, instead.

Partly for high holiday reasons :) but mostly to give the group more time to engage with the potential charter documents and PRs over in https://github.com/swicg/potential-charters

Specifically, during the November call, we'd like to discuss:

1. Adopting a CG Charter (current proposed version: https://github.com/swicg/potential-charters/blob/main/CGCharter-1727386911.html )

2. Adopting an Incubation / Staging process (currently at https://github.com/swicg/potential-charters/blob/main/stage-process.md )

3. Discuss Working Group charter options

   - option 1: Focused AP+AS2 1.1 WG (current proposed charter at https://github.com/swicg/potential-charters/blob/main/ap-maintenance-wg-charter.html )

   - option 2: Wider SocialWeb WG, which includes AP+AS2, but also all the other specs produced by the original WG.

So, everybody has an extra week to read the proposals, make PRs, open issues, and discuss here on the list!

3.