- From: Jos� Manuel Cantera Fonseca <jmcf@tid.es>
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:32:20 +0200
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: Ubiquitous Web Applications Working Group WG <public-uwa@w3.org>
Hi, Good point. I think that we are going to need to think in different kind of policies suitable for different delivery contexts: + Pagination policies + Layout policies + Rendering policies (i.e. the mapping between the abstract and concrete UI) + Content selection policies, i.e . how do you guide a content selection process in order to select the most appropiate content under certain circumstances. + Style policies i.e. how the look and feel of your application might change depending on different delivery contexts + Interaction policies i.e. how the user interface and the input methods might change depending on the available modes of interaction Currently in the MyMobileWeb project we implement policies as a CSS properties and redefining CSSs for different delivery contexts. We do not use XSLT Best Regards Dave Raggett escribi�: > On a different point, I was wondering about adaptation policies for > mapping from the abstract UI layer to the concrete UI layer. > > One idea that I believe Rhys floated was to extend DIAL with new > markup for concrete UI constructs, e.g. panels, radio buttons, tabbed > controls, sliders and the like. > > Authoring at such a level would still be a nuisance as you would have > to deal with the mixing of different levels of abstraction. It would > therefore seem like a good idea to explore how adaptation policies can > map between levels of abstraction in a way that simplifies the > author's task by keeping the layers separated. > > XSLT offers one such route e.g. when combined with the XPath access > functions for the delivery context. Have you explored using XSLT as a > means to translate between levels of abstraction, and if so could you > please offer us comments on your experience? > > I am also interested in going beyond XPath's simple declarative event > handlers to a richer description of application behavior that takes > into account an explicit model of application tasks. SCXML seems very > promising, and I am looking for reports on work on using XML for > dialogue modeling as part of layered descriptions of UI. > > p.s. this is all stuff we need to cover in the wiki. > > Cheers, > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > >
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 18:36:55 UTC