Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions

I like this extension idea. �As much as I'd like to have comics.org's IDs take over the comics world, it's better to allow many and let users sort out what's most useful. �There are already quite a few sites using comics.org issue IDs so we've already got a foothold anyway :-)

thanks,
-henry



>________________________________
> From: "Olson, Peter" <polson@marvel.com>
>To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>; public-vocabs@w3.org 
>Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:13 PM
>Subject: RE: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions
> 
>
>RE: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions 
>Hey -
>
>Ok a nuts-and-bolts question.� I'm going to update the spec to remove some of the localized IDs in favor of doing the extension stuff you mentioned below.� Generally for an extended property (e.g.� <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID" itemtype="http://schema.marvel.com/OurID">) does there need to be an actual page at the URL or does the URI just need to be unique?
>
>-peter
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tue 2/21/2012 9:38 PM
>To: public-vocabs@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions
>
>>
>> What qualifies as ubiquitous enough to be included as an identifier in a schema such as this one?� Is it better to include more (with fewer actually used) or fewer (but more frequently populated)?
>>
>> -������ Peter
>>
>> Peter Olson | VP, Web and Application Development | Marvel Entertainment
>>
>>
>
>I think it would be advantageous to allow as many productID's as
>possible when the need arises. �Linked Data availability or not.
>
>For example, perhaps just extending Schema.org productID to suit ? or
>extending with Good Relations ?
>
><div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product">
>� <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID"
>itemtype="http://ComicsForCheap.com/OurID">123-444-321</span>
>
>or
>
><meta itemprop='productID' content='OurID:123-444-321'/>
>
>Interestingly, I did not find a "generic" productID while looking
>through Good Relations other than a gr:BusinessEntity gr:owns a
>gr:individual gr:ProductorService that has a gr:serialNumber as such
>http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1#serialNumber
>
>So perhaps internal productID's in the case of Comic Issues could also
>use their own gr:serialNumber ??� But I think there is a need to not
>mix the 2 notions of a productID and a serialNumber.� Forewarning :)
>
>--
>-Thad
>http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
>
>
> 
>******************************************************************************
>Nothing contained in this e-mail shall (a) be considered a legally binding agreement, amendment or modification of any agreement with Marvel, each of which requires a fully executed agreement to be received by Marvel or (b) be deemed approval of any product, packaging, advertising or promotion material, which may only come from Marvel's Legal Department.
>******************************************************************************
>THINK GREEN - SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!
>�
>�
>
>