- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:43:05 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: 'Stéphane Corlosquet' <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, 'W3C Web Schemas Task Force' <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 01/22/2014 05:49 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 4:49 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> - Do we really need lastEditor? What about using CreativeWork's >>> editor instead? >>> >>> - Which property is used to connect a question to its answers? >>> AFAICT there's none. >>> What about introducing answer >> >> Do you mean something alongside >> http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/acceptedAnswer so we have the candidate >> answers, as well as the finalized one? > > Exactly. In RDFS-speak, acceptedAnswer would then be a subPropertyOf answer. > > How are cases like these handled in general in Schema.org? Is the preference to create two different properties > > Question -> answer -> all Answers > -> acceptedAnswer -> the subset of accepted Answers > > or to add a property to the thing it points to > > Question -> answer -> all Answers, marked with a property > Such as accepted -> true > > I'm sure you know that off the top of your head so I'm being lazy and ask instead of checking it myself :-) We should try to keep such things consistent. IMO information about which answer got accepted 'belongs' to the question! In case it works #IndyWeb style, where authors of answers would host them on their independent ___domain and just syndicate with website of person asking question, authors of those answers may want to keep full control over content of those answers :) http://tantek.com/2013/113/b1/first-federated-indieweb-comment-thread
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 23:42:46 UTC