Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT

Tom, I like your rewriting here, but I don't see where the "models"
fit ? Were they even present in the first version, beside the title ?
What was intended when mentionning the models here ?

My librarian mind thinks about FRBR and how these experiments should
help demonstrate the efficiency of the new model for building better
end-user applications. If that was the intended meaning, that was
*very* implicit ;-)

Emma

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
>
>> I couldn't quite parse the heading here. �Is it
>>
>> � � "Design (user stories and models) for user interfaces" � � - or:
>> � � "Design (user stories) and (models for user interfaces)"?
>>
>> The section itself, then, did not refer either to user stories or to
>> models. �How about [1]:
>>
>> � � Explore potential new Linked Data-based services with experimental
>> prototypes
>>
>> � � Linked Data should ultimately lead to new and better services to users
>> as
>> � � well as enabling implementers outside of libraries to create
>> applications
>> � � and services based on library data. It is too early to predict what
>> new
>> � � types of services may be developed for information discovery and use.
>> � � Experimental services using library Linked Data should be undertaken
>> in
>> � � order to explore potential use cases and inform the direction of
>> larger
>> � � development efforts.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_recommendations_page_take2&diff=6129&oldid=6126
>>
>
>
> I'm not sure what the precise intention of the section was, originally. But
> I prize the idea to emphasize the need to think about user-oriented
> stories/scenarios/use cases/whatever, and thus keep it in the heading!
>
> Antoine
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 11:02:09 UTC