- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:21:10 +0200
- To: "Semantic-Web@W3.Org," <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Semanticweb@Yahoogroups.Com," <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- CC: Katharina Siorpaes <katharina.siorpaes@deri.at>
Dear all: Is it valid to locally define a subset of an existing OWL / RDF-S vocabulary in your own vocabulary in order to a) avoid ontology imports or b) make it simple for annotation tools to display only a relevant subset of that external vocabulary? In other words, can I declare some FOAF or Dublin Core vocabulary elements, which are relevant for my annotation task, locally in my new ___domain vocabulary, instead of adding an import statement for the whole vocabulary in the ontology header? If that was okay, it would make it easier to prepare pre-composed blends of relevant ontologies that can be directly used for form-based instance data creation. However, I fear that defining an element that is residing in someone else's URI space is not okay, since I (e.g. http://www.heppnetz.de) have no authority of defining the semantics of an element that is within |http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/, even if I what I am saying is consistent with the authoritative definition of the given vocabulary element. | || ||I am assuming that I duplicate the very same specification of the element, i.e., I would assure that my definition just replicates a subset of the official vocabulary. I also abstract from semantic dependencies, i.e., whether it is possible to specify a consistent subset of a given vocabulary (this may not be trivial for an expressive DL ontology, but should be feasible for lightweight RDF-S or OWL vocabularies). Also, the legal point of view (whether I am allowed to replicate an existing specification) is less relevant for me at the moment. I just want to know whether this is an acceptable practice from a Web Architecture perspective. Any feedback would be very much appreciated! Best Martin ----------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-mail: martin.hepp@deri.at web: http://www.heppnetz.de skype: mfhepp office: +43 512 507 6465 Check eClassOWL, the first real-world e-business ontology for products and services in OWL at http://www.heppnetz.de/eclassOWL
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 18:21:33 UTC