- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:27:22 +0000
- To: Damian Steer <pldms@me.com>
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, team-rdf-chairs@w3.org
On 28 Nov 2013, at 15:20, Damian Steer <pldms@me.com> wrote: > we'd be better off saying: > > * rdf and rdfs prefixes are always bound to (whatever they are :-) > * rdf and rdfs prefixes may not be bound to anything else > * parsers should issue a warning if a document attempts to override them > > Which is backward compatible, and requires little effort from library vendors. This doesn�t address the issue that users need to remember what term is in which namespace. That�s completely arbitrary between rdf: and rdfs: (rdfs:Class vs rdf:Property, for example). Best, Richard
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 15:27:47 UTC