- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 23:46:51 +0100
- To: Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
>> The XHTML files have proper namespaces: e.g.: >> http://www.w3.org/Math/testsuite/build/main/Presentation/GeneralLayout/mfrac/mfrac7-simple.xhtml >> or http://www.w3.org/Math/testsuite/build/main/Presentation/GeneralLayout/mfrac/mfrac7-plain.xhtml > > Those will fail in Apache OpenOffice because of the wrong root element. Is XHTML wrong inside OpenOffice? Maybe for some tests... >> The .mml file has been prepared for inclusion in bigger pipelines, some > of which are not namespace aware (in particular, anything to do with > HTML5 tends to consider namespaces rather impolite).[�] Thanks for David to point this out. It had escaped me that you were referring to the MathML2 test suite. The mml files on the MathML3 test-suites are indeed cleanly NS-ed. > Yes. The png-files would be nice too. The svg-testsuite has in its offline version a folder with the .svg-graphics, a folder with the .png images (with same file names as svg) and a folder with an .html environment. Something similar would be good. They are are all there, just change the file name. > But there is no need for a MathML2 version, if a MathML3 version could be made. All my pointers were about the MathML3 version. So� is all you need an archive of the files? Just ask what kind of archive you need and I'll create it for you. I assume you want an archive with the .mml and the .png files. Is that right? Are the xhtml files with the comments not useful too for a human to validate? Unfortunately, the way we publish on the web at the WG makes it a bit bad-style to put several archives on the web-site on a regular basis. Thus, I'd bake the archive your request and make it available on my personal site. thanks in advance. Paul
Received on Friday, 26 December 2014 22:48:13 UTC