- From: Carlos Viegas Dam�sio <cd@di.fct.unl.pt>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:58:48 +0100
- To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <01dd01c39324$74ffc210$dc9e17c3@pccd>
Dear editors, In the current draft of RFC-2396bis the resolution of relative references handles the “abnormal examples” differently. I quote the following from the abnormal examples section in RFC 2396 bis: Parsers must be careful in handling the case where there are more relative path ".." segments than there are hierarchical levels in the base URI's path. Note that the ".." syntax cannot be used to change the authority component of a URI. "../../../g" = "http://a/g" "../../../../g" = "http://a/g" which is different from RFC 2396: Parsers must be careful in handling the case where there are more relative path ".." segments than there are hierarchical levels in the base URI's path. Note that the ".." syntax cannot be used to change the authority component of a URI. ../../../g = http://a/../g ../../../../g = http://a/../../g This affects test case xmlbase/test012.rdf. Which one should be followed? Best regards, Carlos Viegas Dam�sio Carlos Viegas Dam�sio (Prof. Auxiliar) | Tel: +351-21-294 8536 (ext.10758) Departamento de Inform�tica | Fax: +351-21-294 8541 Fac. de Ci�ncias e Tecnologia da | Universidade Nova de Lisboa | Qta. da Torre - 2829-516 Caparica | e-mail: cd@di.fct.unl.pt PORTUGAL | http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~cd
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:07:26 UTC