- From: Bill de h�ra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 20:14:42 +0100
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Aaron > Swartz > > As long as we continue to stick with XML as our data format, > we will be > seen as more complicated than XML (extra work) and will likely > not be used. By moving away we have at least a chance at seeming > simpler (which > I believe RDF is) and getting used. I disagree XML in itself is the sticking point. The thing to do is beat on the XML syntax until it's as simple as RDF is supposed to be. Bill de h�ra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPPvAIOaWiFwg2CH4EQIreQCgxBwLf7XV/52igiDQqzMXh8C9llwAn1D8 fhZTXS4Yfbn1ZHBJFy10uoyR =Zqba -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 3 June 2002 15:18:44 UTC