- From: Validome-Staff <staff@validome.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:40:24 +0200
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Hi Frank, > Is than an > issue in the "XHTML 1.0 transitional" schema or in your code ? Neither an issue in our schema, nor an issue in our code. Our schema validator in the current version simply verificates URIs in accordance to appropriate demands: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#anyURI "such rules and restrictions are not part of type validity and are not checked by �minimally conforming� processors. Thus in practice the above definition imposes only very modest obligations on �minimally conforming� processors. " As you know, there is no so simple as you claim to provide a reliable URI check. At the moment Validome processes URI handling with help of a (simple) schema validation ...It's not exactly brilliant, but - as we know - there is no validaor at the moment, which handles it much better. It is necessary to develop another *concept* for handling URI check. There is someone in our team, who currently works on URI handling concepts in our validator. As "URI" is a nontrivial issue, it will take some more time for modelling and coding an acceptable solution for a sustainable URI check. This will be probably in V3.0 (current version: 2.6.1). BTW: Validome supports validation of IDN domains since May 2007: http://www.validome.org/validate/?uri=http://www.h%c3%a4ndewaschen.de This would also make sense for the W3C-Validator, as it can not handle IDN ___domain validation till now: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.h%C3%A4ndewaschen.de&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 12:34:25 UTC