Re: DAML-S feedback

Thanks Mohamed for your comments.  You are right on the first and the
third point, the ___domain of UNSPSCcode and UNSPSCclassification should be Product
not CompositeProcess and the Congo should refer to TemporalInstancnce
instead of Time.

I think you are right on the second point also,  but I leave David
Martin the final call.


--- Massimo

 > Hi,
 >   I went over DAML-S 0.7 draft version and found these
 > comments as feedback:
 >   
 > 1 - In "ProfileHierarchy.daml" the following is
 > declared:
 > 
 >   <daml:Class rdf:ID="Product">
 >     <daml:comment>
 >       Product is the top level of a Product ontology
 >       for now it records the product classification in
 > UNSPSC
 >     </daml:comment>
 >   </daml:Class>
 > 
 >   
 >   <daml:DataProperty rdf:ID="UNSPSCcode">
 >     <rdfs:___domain rdf:resource="#CompositeProcess"/>  
 >     <!-- SHOULD BE "Product" ??? -->
 >     <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&xsd;#String"/>
 >   </daml:DataProperty>
 >   
 >   <daml:DataProperty rdf:ID="UNSPSCclassification">
 >     <rdfs:___domain rdf:resource="#CompositeProcess"/>  
 >     <!-- SHOULD BE "Product" ??? -->
 >     <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&xsd;#String"/>
 >   </daml:DataProperty>
 >   
 >   
 > and I belive the ___domain in both cases should be
 > "#Product" not "#CompositeProcess", because it makes
 > more sense and at the same time "CompositeProcess"
 > class is not defined in the same ontology.
 > 
 > 
 > 2 - In "Grounding.daml" the following is declared:
 > 
 > <daml:UniqueProperty rdf:ID="damlsProcess">
 >   <rdfs:comment>
 >     The atomic process to which this grounding
 > applies.
 >   </rdfs:comment>
 >   <rdfs:___domain
 > rdf:resource="#WsdlAtomicProcessGrounding"/>
 >   <rdfs:range
 > rdf:resource="&process;#AtomicProcessPowerSet"/>
 > </daml:UniqueProperty>
 > 
 > 
 > "AtomicProcessPowerSet" class is not defined in
 > process ontology 
 > but "AtomicProcessClass" class is the one defined. 
 > So, they should be switched.
 > 
 > 
 > 3 - In "CongoProfile.daml" the following is declared:
 > 
 > <profile:input> 
 >   <profile:ParameterDescription
 > rdf:ID="CreditCardExpirationDate"> 
 >     <profile:parameterName> 
 >       creditCardExpirationDate 
 >     </profile:parameterName>
 >     <profile:restrictedTo rdf:resource="&time;#Time"/>
 >     <profile:refersTo rdf:resource =
 >         "&congoProcess;#creditCardExpirationDate"/>
 >   </profile:ParameterDescription>
 > </profile:input>
 > 
 > 
 > there is no such class "Time" in time ontology, should
 > be changed to
 > "TemporalEntity"?. I'm not sure what should it be.
 > 
 > Please correct me if I'm missing something.
 > 
 > Thank you.
 > 
 > Mohamed Keshk
 > 
 > 
 > __________________________________________________
 > Do you Yahoo!?
 > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
 > http://faith.yahoo.com
 >

Received on Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:04:38 UTC