- From: Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:27:59 -0700
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
How about the exclude-inline-prefixes="c" in p:declare-step because it is interpreted differently than literal result elements? -Rob On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > This pipeline fails. Without running it, can you figure out why? > > <p:declare-step xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc" version="1.0" > � � � � � � � �xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step" > � � � � � � � �exclude-inline-prefixes="c" > � � � � � � � �name="main"> > > <p:input port="parameters" kind="parameter"/> > <p:output port="result"/> > > <p:xslt> > �<p:input port="source"> > � �<p:inline><doc/></p:inline> > �</p:input> > > �<p:input port="stylesheet"> > � �<p:inline> > � � �<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > � � � � � � � � � � �xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step" > � � � � � � � � � � �version="1.0"> > > � � � �<xsl:template match="/"> > � � � � �<xsl:element name="c:wrapper"> > � � � � � �<xsl:apply-templates/> > � � � � �</xsl:element> > � � � �</xsl:template> > � � �</xsl:stylesheet> > � �</p:inline> > �</p:input> > </p:xslt> > > </p:declare-step> > > � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Be seeing you, > � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Language is by its very nature a > http://nwalsh.com/ � � � � � �| communal thing; that is, it expresses > � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �| never the exact thing but a > � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �| compromise--that which is common to > � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �| you, me, and everybody.--T. E. Hulme >
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 17:28:32 UTC