Re: Proposed extension libraries

"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:

> Also, do you expect that the EXProc extensions will be available out of
> the box (in processors that implement them), or that the users will have
> to import a special EXProc library - and if so, what would be its URI?

You have to import a library. I was imagining that we'd wind up with
something like http://exproc.org/steps/fileutils.xpl but of course,
implementations would be encouraged to recognize that URI and load the
values from some cached ___location so that every attempt to use the
exproc steps doesn't actually require hitting the web.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I have often wondered why I [keep]
http://nwalsh.com/            | going...There [can] be no hope and no
                              | reward. I always recognized that bitter
                              | truth. But I am a man, and a man is
                              | responsible for himself.--Sam Magruder
                              | (George Gaylord Simpson)